FACTS, LOGIC, & MATT WALSH: Gay “marriage” by definition can’t be the same as marriage

FACTS, LOGIC, & MATT WALSH: Gay “marriage” by definition can’t be the same as marriage


Walsh: We are told that we
have marriage equality now, that gay marriage is equal
to heterosexual marriage. But equality means sameness.
If two thing are equal, it means that they are the same. If they’re
not the same, they’re not equal. Are same-sex marriages the same
as, equal to, heterosexual marriages? That’s really the question.
I would say, “No.” It doesn’t have to have anything to do with
value judgements or moral judgements. You don’t have to think that the
homosexual act is sinful in order to see that marriage equality is a
nonsensical concept. These two things are different in
a profoundly significant way. The union of a man and a woman has,
in principle, the potential to create, of itself, new life. The union of two
people of the same gender does not ever have that potential. And can never.
And will never. And has never. Again, even if you think that
the two unions are morally equal, which is not a Biblical thought,
but even if you think it, you cannot say that they are equal in
every respect because they certainly are not equal in this respect, and
this is a pretty important respect. You have on one hand a thing,
which is a heterosexual marriage, which can create people. You have
on the other hand a thing, which is the homosexual union, which cannot
create people. Imagine for a second that you’re starting a civilization from
stratch, and you have no prior knowledge. You have never heard of
marriage. You have never heard of the gay marriage debate. You have no
political leanings. Nothing. You have never even heard of the Bible.
You look around, and you see that there are all different kinds of
relationships, and many of them are great. But one kind of relationship
has this weird ability and propensity and habit of creating new people.
When you’re trying to figure out what to call all these different
relationships, don’t you call that relationship something different?
Something that signifies the incredible power and responsibility
that comes with it? This potential of the heterosexual
union to create people is largely why marriage exists, and it is why society
has cherished and protected this institution. It has understood that
a union, which might create a person, should be stable. It should be
permanent. It should be protected. It should be faithful.
It should be monogamous. Every study has shown that children
fare much better in stable, two-parent households than not. Marriage
exists as the foundation for the family unit, and the family unit exists as
the foundation for civilization. If marriages are strong, the family is
strong. If the family is strong, society is strong.
It really is that simple. We see that, historically, one of the
most crucial and elemental functions of marriage was to create the basis upon
which and the context within which children are created and
born and raised.

100 thoughts on “FACTS, LOGIC, & MATT WALSH: Gay “marriage” by definition can’t be the same as marriage

  • August 4, 2019 at 1:10 am
    Permalink

    …..whew!

    (saved)

    Reply
  • August 4, 2019 at 10:44 am
    Permalink

    For many years the intellectual fires of conservatism lay dormant.

    The brilliant ideals birthed in Enlightenment slumbered; limited government, individual liberty, free markets, rule of law, national sovereignty.

    These 5 pillars of classical liberalism built an edifice so secure and comfortable its residents stopped worrying, forgoed vigilance, and took a nap.

    We should be thankful, The Left in it hubris, it’s arrogant ignorance, it’s bitter intolerant closeminded hate… the Left has WOKE a sleeping fire breathing dragon.

    Reply
  • August 4, 2019 at 10:19 pm
    Permalink

    The argument seems to be "straight people are screwing up families so what's the big deal." The first part of that is correct. The question that should be asked is "why?" Why do marriages fail? Selfishness, past hurt, pride, abuse, ect……there's a root cause for divorce. Divorce and messed up marriages are just a symptom of the root cause/causes. Anyone who uses this argument to defend same sex marriage lives in the same denial as a straight couple who are pretending they are "okay". Same sex marriage can not produce offspring. I know, there's the whole "some women/men are infertile" argument. They may be infertile but they still contain the "stuff" it's just broken. No matter how you twist it two men can not put two sperm together nor can two women put two eggs together to create a life. Broken can not be compared to impossible. I guess the test of time will tell if gay marriage can produce a healthier family unit but I doubt it bc inside of all of us is pride, selfishness, wounds from the past that we carry into relationships. My guess is that even with the test of time gay marriages will not survive in record numbers bc no matter the orientation we are all broken in some way. For that reason I believe gay marriages are just as destine to fail so there's no need to get on a high horse over that argument.

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 7:27 am
    Permalink

    Marriage, and Relationships, don't center around sex, or procreation. That just so happens to be a by-product of the most intimate act two can share together. This result is why marriage is often cherished, but that's not its primary function; lest you're more like breeders than lovers.

    When "marriage equality" is brought up, it sounds more like homosexual, or different deviations of, marriage has the same right, or consideration, to get married without the backlash.

    You can have kids without marriage, hence the "logic" does not follow. Marriage is a lovers' union via the epitome of promises, a vow. To remain monogamous in the form of loyalty. As a relationship is being intimate, open, and honest with them, it shouldn't be predicated on a by-product, that's absurd. Women aren't just breeders, they're people too (similarly, I apply this to marriage as well, equal authority until one holds expertise in said topic/field; resulting in compromise when equal standards arise).

    What's more absurd is appealing to a time period where procreation was vital to survival. It's not as important anymore.

    And finally, the Biblical standard is the most absurd. God deems homosexuality a sin, an abomination, and hates it with no justification for it other than, "I said so." It's ridiculous.

    Reply
  • August 6, 2019 at 7:59 am
    Permalink

    I am a person who happens to be gay and I agree with Mister Walsh. The union of man and woman is the only one of the two which can create new life.

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 5:46 am
    Permalink

    …gay marriage can not create "future taxpayers", argument over…

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 7:25 am
    Permalink

    Same-sex marriage is an oxymoron, because it is a contradiction in terms and in concept. True marriage was founded to act as a foundation for families and perpetuating the human race in an ideal, stable situation. What does two gay men shacking up have to do with any of this?

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 9:49 am
    Permalink

    Fair point

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 12:59 pm
    Permalink

    Amen!

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 4:44 pm
    Permalink

    I don't see why gay marriage should not have the same benefits. This guy living in 50s.. No fan of lgbtq shit that's being over represented but I'm not homophobic and all that matters is two people loves each other

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 7:17 pm
    Permalink

    “The homosexual act?” Being gay is not an act. And marriage is not about “creating people”. Creating people is a large side-effect and wonderful NATURAL side effect of marriage, yes, but many people get married that don’t ever want kids and know that they never will once they get married. Do we decide that their marriages aren’t valid? Many people that have children don’t get married. So we are seeing that there is not necessarily a requirement of marriage when it comes to raising children. I agree that it is in the child’s best interest to be raised by two married, committed, supportive parents, yes, but the idea that the genders of those parents are important when pouring cereal, showing love, compassion, sensitivity, responsibility and how to not act like a mesh and act like a decent civilized human being is in itself preposterous. Marriage is about union, commitment, and devotion between two people whether they are going to have children or not and that right should be extended to everyone. The only thing “shut down” in this video is my support for someone I used to think made an effort to always be objective.

    Reply
  • August 7, 2019 at 9:50 pm
    Permalink

    Kids are way over rated. There not gifts from god, there the product of a chemical reaction.

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 6:39 am
    Permalink

    So if we put all females on one planet that could sustain life and all males on another similar planet and on the females planet no human male sperm was ever available by any means then how long before both planets cease to have any humans left alive? which just goes to show how gay marriages are nowhere near being equal to hetro ones.

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 9:23 am
    Permalink

    Im a gay man and found this very interesting. He wasn't criticising gay relationships but highlighting the difference between them and straight ones. Not moralizing, demonizing just calmly making his point.

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 6:46 pm
    Permalink

    This is news to some. It amazes me that any honest person can or would argue this.

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 7:28 pm
    Permalink

    First comes love
    Then comes marriage
    Then comes a baby in a baby carriage (if you're in a heterosexual union)

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 7:30 pm
    Permalink

    Facts don't care about your feelings

    Reply
  • August 8, 2019 at 10:27 pm
    Permalink

    IF gay marriage was normal it would happen naturally. It doesn't. We know all about heterosexual marriage. what is not spoken of for gay marriages are the accepted promiscuity and the threat of viral diseases. Lesbians have been living quietly together for years. No fanfare. No usurping of cultural idea of marriage. Gay marriages are proving not psychologically good for children.

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 12:46 am
    Permalink

    Amen

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 2:23 am
    Permalink

    What if a heterosexual couple doesn’t want kids or can’t have kids? Does that then make their marriage less “equal” to those who can?

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 3:19 am
    Permalink

    why is this asshole mentioning the bible??? that just weakens the argument. I agree with the guy's main idea, but you can't be mentioning a fairytale book to help you.

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 6:32 am
    Permalink

    Who are the 75 dummies that disliked this statement? Face the truth, or get back in your closet!

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 6:34 am
    Permalink

    No I'm not racist.

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 9:43 am
    Permalink

    Ahhh yes… definitions. I remember the dictionary. Could it be possible that Americans would solve a shit load of problems with that one simple tool?🤔 Forget free health care, FREE dictionaries for all!

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 10:20 am
    Permalink

    Bro… there is already too many people on this planet! I dislike your argument because of that.
    If any couple can actually do marage let them do it and pay the taxes and contribute.

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 2:56 pm
    Permalink

    Absolute bullshit…marriage has nothing to do with reproduction..you can create a baby without marriage

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 8:28 pm
    Permalink

    But people don’t get married just to have children. I want to get married, that’s very important to me, to a man, but I do NOT want kids. Marriage does not = reproduction. That’s my issue with his argument. And since two gay people can adopt, I believe marriage is still necessary, it even support his argument.

    Reply
  • August 9, 2019 at 11:29 pm
    Permalink

    is he MOULTING?

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 1:38 am
    Permalink

    While, I'm fairly conservative, this is about the only conservative argument I can't really get behind. Does it matter that they can't have children? I can't have children. Does that make all marriages between people that can't have children "unequal?" Does two people getting married have some effect on my life? Not really. Does it have some sort of impact on my rights? No.

    Lots of heterosexual couples CHOOSE not to have children. Should they not be barred from marriage by the government? I don't think so.

    We aren't starting a society from scratch. It's not really a good comparison.

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 5:08 am
    Permalink

    Marriage should be built on commitment – not procreation. By focusing on commitment, everyone benefits: infertile people, elderly people, disabled people, people who are pregnant, and gay people. It is good for the American taxpayer for gay individuals to rely on a partner and not the state for support.

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 6:04 am
    Permalink

    We won't have "marriage equality" until humans can marry their pets! The LEFT will never stop pushing the perversion envelope!

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 11:09 am
    Permalink

    1:28 "you have on one hand a thing, which is heterosexual marriage, which can create people"

    lmao he thinks straight people can only have children when they're married and this is advertised as logical and reasonable. Marriage is not about having children anymore, not to the state and the law, it doesn't matter if the couple can or can't procreate. Also, sterile straight people exist and they also marry.

    No need to hate me, I'm just using logic and reasoning.

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 3:51 pm
    Permalink

    It almost seems like a crime today to have an opinion in favor for the traditional family. Tragic times

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 8:21 pm
    Permalink

    So, people that can not have children for whatever reasons should not be allowed to marry then?

    Reply
  • August 10, 2019 at 10:31 pm
    Permalink

    This is terribly one sided. It's possible to reproduce without marriage. It's possible to adopt orphaned children. It's possible to get a sperm donor. It's 2019 people..

    Reply
  • August 11, 2019 at 12:44 am
    Permalink

    Sad that u need a debate for common sense nowadays smh.🤦‍♂️

    Reply
  • August 11, 2019 at 1:00 am
    Permalink

    By his logic it makes sense very logical though.

    Reply
  • August 11, 2019 at 1:23 pm
    Permalink

    Lol no. Marriage is about showing someone that they are the person for you and you wanna stay with them forever. With all this overpopulation going on we don't need 20 some kids per household anyway.

    Reply
  • August 11, 2019 at 2:09 pm
    Permalink

    When you need to justify the important of family, you know it is the end of the west civilisation, take the extinction of Euorpe as an example.

    Reply
  • August 11, 2019 at 5:55 pm
    Permalink

    Alot of people don't realize how true this really is. I've seen Christians, of which I am one, not understand the core reason why gay marriage is completely antithetical to a civilization. Marriage at its core cannot include homosexuals because that wasn't the original design. It's not bigoted or "homophobic(which is a phony term)" to analyze that as such. The bible supports this as well, and so does science and biology. It's no coincidence that the more we ignore these fundamental truths that we now have issues such as low birth rates in America.

    Reply
  • August 12, 2019 at 7:42 am
    Permalink

    Very good point for heterosexual relationships…..homosexuality is never, has never, & will never be equally as important as heterosexuality

    Reply
  • August 12, 2019 at 9:59 am
    Permalink

    This is brilliant

    Reply
  • August 12, 2019 at 3:08 pm
    Permalink

    I am not a Homosexual, but I am a sinner. A person who follows a lifestyle as a Homosexual is a sinner. However; since I'm a sinner, I've no right to judge the Homosexual person except to treat them as a person w/ the rights that I have. So that makes us common though we're different in our choice of lifestyle. I agree w/ Matt, Marriage has its own definition & Civil Union should have its own. The two aren't the same & that's OK. Be respectful but lets stop piggy-backing these Life choice concepts.

    Reply
  • August 12, 2019 at 3:32 pm
    Permalink

    Gay marriage isn't marriage, it's an economic property sharing agreement at best and a tax dodge at worse, nothing more and nothing less,

    Reply
  • August 12, 2019 at 11:19 pm
    Permalink

    I don't get it. Do gays think that being gay in itself is not some kind of chemical imbalance? They DO realize it is not natural or beneficial for the species, right? It is a biological fluke. Having mentally unstable people raising children just sounds like a bad idea. How on Earth did the idea of a man taking it up the taterhole become worthy of parenting?! What kind of fucked up society are we?!

    Reply
  • August 13, 2019 at 4:50 am
    Permalink

    This is exactly true. Like Matt says: take EVERYTHING ELSE out of the equation. Come to planet earth as an alien researcher: no knowledge of religion, politics, philosophy, etc. You watch humans intermingling in all sorts of relationship arrangements. But only in ONE of them does something bizarre happen: a whole 'nother human is created. If, as an alien researcher, you don't call THAT relationship and interaction something DIFFERENT from the other relationships and interactions…. you're an idiot alien researcher. You don't know how to spot patterns, and how to spot unique phenomena.

    Reply
  • August 13, 2019 at 4:14 pm
    Permalink

    Really? We back on this shit?

    Reply
  • August 14, 2019 at 12:29 am
    Permalink

    We're trying to win the culture war and you think THIS is the way to do it??

    There's a reason we nominated Donald Trump and not Rick Santorum. You idiots bitching about gay marriage is like pointing out a typo in the newspaper while the house is burning down around you.

    The "Moral Majority" is waiting in the wings, and that is the biggest reason people on the fence aren't voting for conservatives or Republicans.

    Reply
  • August 14, 2019 at 5:37 pm
    Permalink

    Imagine for a second, there are heterosexual marriages that physically CANNOT create new people. Are they still the same equal marriage to those that can? 🤷🏻‍♂️

    Reply
  • August 14, 2019 at 9:38 pm
    Permalink

    I don’t understand, so what if a man and man or woman and woman can’t create life. Our earth is over populated as is with more orphaned children than we can ever account for. Maybe it’s not such a bad thing. And you don’t even have to be married to have offspring so what’s the real value here. I’m usually right leaning but this is religious bullshit at its finest. If marrying someone of the same sex makes you happy why should I care? How does it affect my personal life?

    Reply
  • August 15, 2019 at 1:31 am
    Permalink

    Did we get 7.6 billion people on this planet currently and billions upon billions of people throughout history because of homosexual intercourse?

    Reply
  • August 15, 2019 at 1:32 am
    Permalink

    Same sex marriage is not equal to heterosexual marriage.

    Reply
  • August 16, 2019 at 8:18 am
    Permalink

    Destroy fake marriage. Repeal this abomination wherever it has infested society.

    Reply
  • August 17, 2019 at 7:14 am
    Permalink

    God defined marriage as one man and one woman. Man cannot change that definition. Sodomy is an abomination, not a marriage.

    Reply
  • August 17, 2019 at 10:51 am
    Permalink

    its a circus for mental issues people..the only problem they have is their selfs

    Reply
  • August 17, 2019 at 3:23 pm
    Permalink

    So…. if someone is sterile. Their marriage isn't real?
    I'm usually completely on board with these videos, but the logic in this one isn't very good and seems like more of an attempt to guise religious beliefs as logic.

    If we make marriage strictly a religious rite and separate the church from the state as it should be, we could clear up a lot of the issues we have.
    If two people love each other and wants to get married, that's great. If a church doesn't want to perform that marriage, that's perfectly fine.

    Being against gay marriage is a religious stance. Religion and logic don't get along one bit.

    Reply
  • August 18, 2019 at 12:00 am
    Permalink

    I agree with everything this guy says… But he still looks like he's on cocaine.

    Reply
  • August 18, 2019 at 4:50 am
    Permalink

    So according to your own logic, heterosexuals who are infertile should not be allowed to get married as sex is solely for procreation. Since you're obviously stating that sex is solely for procreation and not for pleasure, birth control for heterosexuals should be outlawed. Millions of heterosexual couples live together, outside of marriage, in sin, and yet you never squawk about this. You just drone on about gay people.

    Reply
  • August 18, 2019 at 4:53 am
    Permalink

    So, two men or two women, who have loved each other, lived with each other, and supported each other their entire adult lives, should not be able to get married. But I can go into a bar, pick up a woman, and we can get married that night. That you're OK with.

    Reply
  • August 18, 2019 at 8:41 am
    Permalink

    God bless, prosper, and protect you and your family.+

    Reply
  • August 19, 2019 at 2:43 am
    Permalink

    No one will ever be able to rightly justify being against gay marriage. Anyone against it is an asshole.

    Reply
  • August 19, 2019 at 5:19 pm
    Permalink

    Satan and the deep state want to destroy the Family structure in America. By doing so they will unravel the binds that tie Americans together. Which will destroy America. Look close you can see it happening right now! Most liberals believe there is nothing wrong with sleeping around or having sex before marrage, which brings millions of babies into this world without a family.

    Reply
  • August 29, 2019 at 2:01 am
    Permalink

    EXACTLY.
    2 hormones does NOT equal
    a man & a woman…

    2 Lesbos Does NOT equal
    a man and a woman…

    Fuck MENTALITY ILL LEFTISM..

    Reply
  • August 29, 2019 at 5:17 pm
    Permalink

    Why is Matt always so shiny?

    Reply
  • September 3, 2019 at 1:19 pm
    Permalink

    Traditional Marriage: Can make love, make babies and model both parental roles.

    Reply
  • September 4, 2019 at 5:10 am
    Permalink

    Equal doesn't mean same. Men and women aren't same but yet they are been given equal rights. Same way hetero marriage and gay marriage isn't same but the equality to marriage and living with the one you love is the right everybody deserves, regardless of their sexuality. And if marriage was really meant for procreation, your sex organs wouldn't work until you tied the knot, but it does work. Right? There are pregnancies outside marriage. Marriage is made for two people who love each other (romantic), that also counts gays.

    Reply
  • September 4, 2019 at 10:52 pm
    Permalink

    There is no same sex marriage. It's a perverted use of the word marriage is all.

    Reply
  • September 4, 2019 at 10:52 pm
    Permalink

    There is no same sex marriage. It's a perverted use of the word marriage is all.

    Reply
  • September 5, 2019 at 7:09 pm
    Permalink

    Today I learned that same sex couples can't have kids. Thanks dude. But in all seriousness, I've been enjoying this channel and this video sticks out to me as silly. It's sort of unfortunate as I think the world needs people that are compelling and have common sense whether they're left or right . I have no idea what this guys is trying to say except reassuring Christian's that same sex couples cannot have kids and straight couples can, and without people we wouldn't have society therefore kids are good. There's a way to be a persuasive convicted Christian, this is not an example of that. If I'm missing his point please educate me

    Reply
  • September 6, 2019 at 5:52 pm
    Permalink

    Here’s the deal, for me:

    I’m a Christian. I believe that homosexuality is, indeed, a sin.

    However, what we are talking about in this country is denying people certain legal advantages, and hindering their access to a kind of confirmation of their feelings, that is extended to another group of people based on sexual preference. I’m not okay with that. If part of homosexuality was slinging a puppy into a ceiling fan every day, that would be one thing. But it isn’t. It’s just two people that love each other. I say let ‘em get hitched.

    The other side of that, though, is no one, NO ONE, gets to compel a church, temple, mosque, whatever, to officiate the ceremony by force and against their religious stance. No one can compel any one else to take part in it, much like my wife and I couldn’t compel my estranged sister to participate in our wedding. Freedom flows both ways, folks.

    Reply
  • September 7, 2019 at 8:10 pm
    Permalink

    Men are Men. Women are Women. You can't fool Mother Nature. For entirely obvious reasons, union and matrimony cannot be viewed as the same thing. Believe it or not, "The left hand does not know what the right hand is doing." Now then, try sharing an obvious truth with any number of these dim wits: It's OK to have perspective. And it's OK …NOT to have to talk about it. …America has become a Zombie Nation. Far too many people are dumbed-down, drugged-up and plugged-in. This is never meant to be!

    Reply
  • September 9, 2019 at 1:14 am
    Permalink

    The benefits of marriage, be them financial or legal, should not be bestowed on any married couple unless or until they have children. Prior to that, a married couple can have some system arranged for the preparation to receive those benefits, and even some benefits of medical care to those who struggle with fertility issues, but anything else given makes absolutely no sense to a married couple with no children.. and CERTAINLY giving such benefits/medical care to gay couples is a waste in principle.

    Reply
  • September 9, 2019 at 2:58 am
    Permalink

    An excellent argument for marriage under the state here. The state and its institutions are there to protect its citizens, not the least of which is to protect the marriage act.

    Reply
  • September 9, 2019 at 5:16 am
    Permalink

    So what does this guy call the union of heterosexuals who cannot have children? According his "logic", they shouldn't be allowed to call it marriage because he thinks the potential to reproduce is a pre-requisite.

    Reply
  • September 9, 2019 at 1:17 pm
    Permalink

    Many believe that it's predominantly vanity that motivates some people to reproduce – they want to create another version of themselves. Others believe that having children will prevent their partner from leaving them. Either way, reproduction can be based on a very selfish motivation. But a same-sex relationship is different as they cannot reproduce with each other – it's just two people who love each other and who want to be together, despite the fact that society has been telling them that it's wrong for their entire lives. So that means a same-sex relationship actually has the potential to be more deeply felt and authentic than a relationship based on the ability to reproduce. Maybe this guy should have thought about it a bit longer before he claimed moral superiority!

    Reply
  • September 12, 2019 at 9:36 am
    Permalink

    Lol the people that defend lgbt rights won’t exist without heterosexuals

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 4:26 pm
    Permalink

    If marriage is strong, family is strong, society is strong ——————————> and there's no need for strong government

    THAT is why this has been pushed for

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 9:10 am
    Permalink

    Marriage doesn't create new people. Sex does

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 9:18 pm
    Permalink

    anybody have a link to the full video?

    Reply
  • October 5, 2019 at 10:53 pm
    Permalink

    This is a good example of the problem with American politics, only two sides, each side claims a side of every issue and it's all or nothing. If you agreed with Ben Shapiro with his views on Gender, economics, race but you also wanted abortion available to those that choose it and equal marriage. Then you are fucked, neither party will take you.

    Reply
  • October 10, 2019 at 3:21 am
    Permalink

    Somebody please pat down his forehead.

    Reply
  • October 14, 2019 at 1:17 am
    Permalink

    Homosexuality is disgusting and most of the people in the planet agree with me (well maybe not the left)

    Reply
  • October 14, 2019 at 7:21 pm
    Permalink

    Marriage equality had been reached when interethnic marriage was legalized.

    Reply
  • October 15, 2019 at 3:45 am
    Permalink

    Marriage is a religious word — meaning the bonding of a man and a woman.
    Gays can not be married. They can have a union but not a marriage.

    Reply
  • October 18, 2019 at 4:14 am
    Permalink

    Gay marriage should be equal in a legal sense and that's it

    Reply
  • October 26, 2019 at 5:27 pm
    Permalink

    Marriage is separate from being able to produce children. Lame argument.

    Reply
  • November 1, 2019 at 1:19 pm
    Permalink

    Matt Walsh is like Dan Bilzerians more grounded brother who looks like the younger one, but was actually a teenager when Dan was born

    Reply
  • November 7, 2019 at 5:34 pm
    Permalink

    I personally think marriage is a union between two individuals who commit to spending the rest of their lives together. Marriage isn't just for people to procreate. What about couples who can't have children. Just my thoughts.

    Reply
  • November 18, 2019 at 1:02 pm
    Permalink

    Marriage don't create people. I'm all for a challenging argument but this is a dumb one.

    Reply
  • November 18, 2019 at 10:24 pm
    Permalink

    Who fucking cares?? Why put so much thought into this?? If a dude wants to marry another dude, who gives a shit?

    Reply
  • November 18, 2019 at 11:20 pm
    Permalink

    Infertile straight couples?

    Reply
  • December 9, 2019 at 11:54 am
    Permalink

    We need more Trans-mother maternity wards.

    Reply
  • December 12, 2019 at 3:57 am
    Permalink

    Marriage is not required to create people though Matt. So why is that even an argument. You would also still advocate for heterosexual marriage if the wife was unable to have kids. The truth is you are against same sex marriage because you morally disagree with it because of your religion.

    Reply
  • December 14, 2019 at 11:40 pm
    Permalink

    Bruh this guy has jiffy lube all over his face, but good speech though.

    Reply
  • December 17, 2019 at 10:42 pm
    Permalink

    Marriage the most valuable event to create a family it is gifted to us, humans, even animals dont get married.

    Reply
  • January 5, 2020 at 1:53 am
    Permalink

    Same sex marriage simply creates a market for children, and this is the place we have got to in society – the traficking of children so those who cannot produce them can obtain them in the name of equality. If a gay or lesbian couple want a child they should produce one…..naturally.

    Reply
  • January 15, 2020 at 3:03 am
    Permalink

    Lol what a salty bitch. The bible diddn't invent marriage. Christians against same sex marriage should sit this one out. Fucking hypocrites.

    Reply
  • January 17, 2020 at 7:13 pm
    Permalink

    WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW….. BRILLIANT AGAIN!!!!!!!

    Reply
  • January 24, 2020 at 7:32 pm
    Permalink

    Oh, I see the problem. He says he's talking about marriage. What he's really talking about is fucking. We don't have to be married to have children anymore. What's the fucking problem?

    Reply
  • January 31, 2020 at 11:17 am
    Permalink

    Dummest shit ever

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *